Why should GM CEO bow to any socialist wishes of Obama? - bow magazine
Wagoner, GM chief to resign at the request of the White House.
1 year ago, Wagoner had been included in a major car magazine as the man most influential in the automotive world. It is still, and the White House is inexperienced "leader" ever. What a joke.
Please light in the darkness here.
Bow Magazine Why Should GM CEO Bow To Any Socialist Wishes Of Obama?
3 comments:
Good question. The government has no business (pun not intended), to interfere in private affairs. Infact, to prevent this violation of the Constitution, the salvation of all essential measures was no vote.
Such disregard for the reservoir is constitutional challenge.
We exchange only capitalism to socialism. If the fucking Executive Director, representing the shareholders to the contrary. If they do, then it's their loss will not be saved, or disturb them.
The government already has a safety net for workers. Unemployment appeal.
If he wants money from the government, must meet the state standards are offered. If he do not have money, he did not accept it - but then "their" company founder.
I say "his" company, because GM actually belongs to the shareholders, not the "CEO".
Let go And if the shareholders of the Company under, they deserve to lose. I say there should be absolutely no purchase Mega-Corporation, in each case - including the mega-Enterprise Finance Corporation.
Do not worry, somewhere End Nice.
It takes the heat for the government. His resignation is inappropriate guilt and concern about public expenditure Hyper current government on his shoulders, and GM. Regardless of Geithner and his problems. Ignore the man behind the curtain. How practical is it.
Post a Comment